Blog 2 of 3
The challenge of oligonucleotide delivery
The only effective way to administer an oligonucleotide is by injection into the target organ. Oligonucleotides are typically large hydrophilic polyanions, meaning they do not easily pass through plasma membranes. Several factors prevent these molecules from reaching their correct intracellular site of action. As a result, almost all approved oligonucleotide drugs must be administered locally. At the moment the liver is the only exception due to its high tissue perfusion and abundance of receptors that facilitate oligonucleotide uptake.
Strategies for enhancing oligonucleotide delivery
There are numerous strategies being developed to enhance the delivery of oligonucleotides, potentially changing the formulation and mode of drug delivery. However for now, we have to manufacture a sterile injection formulation. For this reason, the current guidance for sterile manufacturing is applicable for oligonucleotide manufacturing, and as mentioned in a previous blog ICH Q6A should be considered for oligonucleotide drug products as most tests as described in 3.3.2.3 are applicable for this type of formulation with the exception of some non-compendial tests.
Oligonucleotide drug product manufacturing process
The general process flow for drug product manufacturing of oligonucleotides is relatively simple. Lyophilization of synthetic oligonucleotides is considered common practice and for that reason it can be assumed that the API used in drug product manufacturing is a lyophilized powder.
These APIs generally dissolve well in an aqueous solution. Water as its only excipient may be sufficient in many cases but stability or tonicity limitations may require the addition of other excipients. Oligonucleotide DP concentrations may vary significantly depending on the method of delivery. Intravenous products generally utilise lower DP concentrations compared with products delivered subcutaneously.
In-process controls to determine the concentration of the drug product solution can be considered but in-process controls to assess the microbiological burden of the product or filter integrity should be in place.
Considerations for drug product concentration and Sterility
Oligonucleotide drug product (DP) concentrations vary depending on the delivery method.
A primary function of the parenteral drug product manufacturing process is to ensure sterility of the final product. Generally, oligonucleotides are sterilised by membrane filtration followed by aseptic filling and finish. Currently, the only sterilisation technique used for marketed oligonucleotide drug products, for which public information is available, is exclusively by membrane filtration. In most cases, the justification for using sterile filtration and aseptic processing over terminal sterilisation (TS) was due to an observed negative impact of TS to product quality. However, TS provides greater sterility assurance than membrane sterilisation and it is a regulatory expectation that TS is the preferred method for sterilising parenteral products.
Oligonucleotides may have fundamental differences in physical and chemical properties between subclasses and therefore feasibility assessment for TS should be performed on a case-by-case basis and follow a scientific and risk-based approach.
Platform knowledge is important and may be sufficient to rule out TS for a given chemical entity, provided there is deep understanding of the impacts of the sterilisation process on the product. For more thermally stable oligonucleotides and instances where deep product and process knowledge does not exist, feasibility must be assessed by well-designed and controlled laboratory studies.
Solid vs. liquid oligonucleotide APIs
As mentioned oligonucleotide APIs are typically provided as a lyophilized powder, but there is a growing interest in having the API as a solution, although this is not in line with current guidance, for example: EMA guidance. Here is a list of pros and cons for a solid or liquid API. The most important factors to have Oligonucleotides as a solution are stability and microbiology.
In general, oligonucleotides are very stable in solution at 2C–8C around neutral pH and with common excipients such as sodium chloride. Additional steps in the drug substance manufacturing process to obtain a solid may have a negative influence on physical or chemical stability.
As we are manufacturing a sterile product microbiology is an important factor. Although the microbiological stability of a solid is typically better than a liquid an additional compounding step in the drug product manufacturing process may eliminate this benefit. Compounding of a solid to a solution occurs typically in a GMP grade C area before transferring the GMP grade B and A for Aseptic Fill-Finish, while API in solution may be used directly in GMP grade B and A.
Advantages of a solution API
This method, commonly used in biologics, eliminates dissolution and compounding steps required for powder APIs. It also allows for process flexibility, enabling dilution adjustments for different drug product concentrations.
A solution API offers greater robustness and efficiency in drug product manufacturing. The ready-to-fill solution API is common for biologics. This scenario is the least complex and this approach eliminates the initial dissolution and compounding steps in the DP manufacturing process that are required with a powder API. Additional dilution steps may be added to the same process if the final product requires different drug product concentrations.
Regulatory considerations for solution APIs
Currently, the EMA considers formulated oligonucleotide APIs, (solution APIs) as drug product intermediates rather than drug substances. This is in contrast with formulated biologic APIs. The current regulatory framework is more restrictive for oligonucleotides and the use of formulated APIs should be justified extensively with improved stability over solid APIs. The manufacturing process should be substantially more sustainable, incorporating less resource-intensive steps in both drug substance and drug product production.
However, the current draft of the EMA Guideline on the Development and Manufacture of Oligonucleotides includes the option of solution APIs, provided some requirements are met. The composition of the formulation should be clearly defined, components used in the manufacture of the formulated API should be controlled as critical raw materials, and the downstream process must be adequately characterised and controlled to consistently produce API meeting its quality targets.
Ensuring quality and microbial control
Microbial controls incorporated into the process should assure consistent delivery of low bioburden, low endotoxin-formulated API appropriate for further aseptic processing yielding a sterile drug product. The microbial control strategy should include elements of facility design, process controls, personnel requirements, environmental and utility monitoring systems, and procedural responses to contamination.
For more information
Learn more about our comprehensive Accelerated Pharmaceutical Solutions and how ICON’s experts can support the development of optimal formulations for your clinical trial.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel