Across geographies and therapeutic areas, we have observed a notable shift in protocol development trends. Where protocols we reviewed once contained significant gaps, they are now more complete but often more complex than necessary to achieve the underlying scientific goals. In addition to the burden, cost and time associated with the additional complexity, protocols across the board seem to be no less vulnerable to amendments. According to Tufts 2023 data, increasing trial sizes, expanded scopes and the burden of additional endpoints contribute to the growing complexity of protocols. More than 75% of clinical trial protocols require at least one substantial amendment1.
To navigate these challenges, a consultative, multidisciplinary approach to protocol development is essential. By incorporating a holistic approach from the outset, sponsors can develop protocols that are scientifically sound, operationally efficient, patient-centric and inclusive.
Four facets of protocol perfection
An optimal protocol must balance multiple elements to ensure a study is both scientifically sound and operationally feasible. At ICON, we have developed a structured protocol optimisation process that focuses on four foundational aspects:
Scientific and operational risk: This ensures feasibility and that the endpoints and data collection requirements are achievable within the proposed study population and timeline. It also includes considerations for recruitment, retention and data collection challenges.
Completeness: Protocols today start from a more comprehensive foundation, but completeness should not lead to complacency. A well-structured protocol clearly defines study procedures, assessments and timelines to ensure consistency and avoid ambiguity for site staff.
Complexity: While completeness is critical, excessive complexity creates burden. For example, many protocols include overly restrictive eligibility criteria and excessive assessments that add little scientific value. Simplifying these elements can reduce patient burden, optimise resource allocation and streamline site operations.
Diversity and inclusion: Creating a representative trial population is both an ethical and scientific imperative and it begins at the protocol level. We pressure test the trial’s accessibility by evaluating recruitment criteria, site locations and study procedures. Comparing this to our Patient Voice data, we can identify even small adjustments that will enable more patient-centred trials that produce more representative clinical trial data.
Enhancing individual protocols requires a holistic approach. By balancing these four dimensions, sponsors can develop protocols that align with study goals, regulatory expectations, and operational realities, ultimately maximising the return on investment.
Quantifying protocol quality
A structured, data-driven assessment is key to improving protocol quality. Our process begins with a comprehensive checklist that addresses the four facets of protocol development, to ensure a protocol is on the right track.
Where our approach diverges from industry norms is in quantifying protocol quality. We assign a “percentage to perfection” score, providing sponsors with clear visibility into a protocol’s strengths and weakness, actionable insights on necessary adjustments, and the impact those changes will have on study execution and timelines. Our multidisciplinary three-tiered review goes beyond a surface-level checklist by evaluating the interrelatedness of individual protocol elements across study stages. This in-depth structured review provides robust, cross-functional feedback ensuring scientifically and operationally sound enhancements in as little as five days.
Consultative approach to protocol design
Protocol optimisation can begin as early as the study concept stage, progressing through the development of an ICH-compliant protocol synopsis. We collaborate with sponsors to review and define the research question and identify the most appropriate study, as well as ensure the protocol supports a clinically meaningful treatment effect and aligns scientific rigor with operational feasibility. The resulting protocol synopsis outlines the objectives, methodology, eligibility criteria, variables, statistical methods and study-specific procedures and schedules.
Every recommendation we provide is backed by quantitative analysis and real-world expertise. This evidence-driven approach ensures sponsors understand the rationale behind suggested protocol adjustments, making it easier to implement meaningful changes that align with organisational goals and scientific objectives.
This consultative approach offers a distinct advantage, as sponsors gain insights from a multidisciplinary team that considers clinical, regulatory, operational and patient-focused factors. Ultimately, even small changes can have big impacts. The ability to balance opinions with evidence through ICON’s consultative and data-driven framework for protocol optimisation is especially valuable in helping sponsors develop protocols that will withstand regulatory scrutiny, minimise costly amendments and accelerate study timelines.
Protocol optimisation from square one
A comprehensive, well-designed protocol mitigates unnecessary complications, reduces costs and minimises delays. This is especially true when optimisation is prioritised from the start. At ICON, our experts in protocol development provide an integrated perspective that balances scientific integrity with operational efficiency. Acting as a single point of contact for the multidisciplinary evaluations required for a complete, comprehensive design, we help sponsors develop best-fit protocols from the outset. Starting with an optimised protocol can result in fewer late-stage amendments that contribute to delays, increased costs, and operational inefficiencies. By partnering with ICON, sponsors can streamline the development process and accelerate timelines and optimise outcomes at all phases – ensuring success from square one.
Contact ICON today to learn how we can help you design protocols that drive efficiency, enhance patient engagement and accelerate your clinical development goals.
References:
1 Tufts CSDD. Impact Report, Vol 25, Number 2, Mar/April 2023
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Obesity
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel