The global shift towards electronic Common Technical Document (eCTD) submissions has reached critical momentum. Regulatory agencies worldwide now expect life science organisations to adhere to eCTD standards, not just for new drug applications but also for ongoing lifecycle management, clinical trial approvals and marketing applications. With this shift, the demand for precise and compliant translations of core dossier components has risen. In an increasingly competitive landscape, pharmaceutical companies face mounting pressure to expedite global filings, while maintaining high quality and compliance standards. Regulatory complexity continues to increase as health authorities enforce region specific requirements alongside global guidelines. In this blog we outline why adoption of eCTD dossiers has increased and why translation requires regulatory expertise as well as language skills.
eCTD dossier adoption and structure
Although not mandatory in every market yet, sponsors across the world have shown a preference for eCTD. They recognise that the common structure and electronic format make it easier to identify, manage and submit updates. This allows regulatory authorities to locate and compare them easily. Formatting is prescribed and consistent, all eCTD dossiers follow the same structure and provide regulatory agencies with the necessary information to make decisions about drug approvals for their region.
Because of the detailed information included, eCTD dossiers can contain hundreds, or even thousands of pages. Despite their volume, their structure and formatting are universal. All eCTD dossiers are divided into five distinct modules, as shown in the CTD Triangle below.1
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e528/0e528b7c49b4f71f28f23eda0fb74e2d39d60ed7" alt="application dossier diagram application dossier diagram"
When an eCTD dossier translation may be required
If you obtain a compound that has already been approved in one geographic region and plan to market it in another region through a new drug application, you might need a complete eCTD dossier translation. For example, if your drug is approved for use in Japan, the final eCTD dossier would have been submitted in Japanese. However, if your company intends to distribute and hold Rest of World (RoW) rights, the new submission must be made in English once the acquisition process is complete.
Why Regulatory and Translation teams should be in sync
As well as being lengthy, eCTD dossiers are highly technical. Any errors with consistency, grammar, or formatting can stall approval. Mistranslations can cause delays, the loss of a commercial advantage, and quickly add up to millions of dollars in lost revenue. It is crucial for the translation team working on these projects to have direct access to regulatory experts to consult on the language, formatting and structure that regulatory authorities will demand.
Collaborating with a translation team within a CRO is advisable to ensure that your eCTD dossier benefits from the necessary regulatory expertise. As an in-house CRO translation team, ICON Language Services collaborates with regulatory, clinical and therapeutic experts. This reduces delays in information-seeking and ensures that the translation is accurate and compliant. With locations in more than 40 countries our specialists can translate into over 300 languages.
While eCTD dossiers have a common structure and format, every dossier is unique. ICON Language Services has a flexible approach to meet different sponsors’ needs. A regulatory project manager with expertise in end-to-end regulatory submissions oversees the entire translation process and final eCTD formatting tasks. This ensures that the translation meets the quality standards and timelines agreed with the sponsor as well as the regulatory authorities’ requirements.
Staying ahead in a competitive market
CTD and eCTD dossiers help sponsors and regulatory authorities to organise the large volume of information necessary for a drug approval. When seeking approval for a product in a new market, the stakes are high. Even small delays can have a ripple effect, disrupting a carefully crafted launch strategy. Seeking support from a language service embedded in a CRO ensures that your eCTD dossier translation is accurate and managed appropriately. As regulatory frameworks evolve and pharmaceutical companies acquire products to expand into new markets, our ICON language and regulatory teams can expedite your eCTD dossier submission process and help your product reach new markets sooner.
Partner with ICON Language Services to accelerate your core dossier submissions.
Contact us today.
Reference
1M4: The Common Technical Document. The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. https://www.ich.org/page/ctd Published 2008. Accessed 22 January, 2025.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel