Many medications that are prescribed for children are prescribed off-label. Information and data from clinical trials of drugs in children are essential to support evidence-based pediatric therapies. Without this information, health care providers rely on other sources of clinical and scientific evidence to assess if the benefits of a medication outweigh the risks for a specific patient. Health Canada is taking steps to increase the availability of data that will help health care providers make these important decisions. International regulators such as the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) have developed legislative and regulatory tools to encourage the:
- Study of the safety and efficacy of drugs in pediatric populations and
- Submission of findings from those studies to the regulatory agencies
Pediatric drug development is a critical aspect of pharmaceutical research, ensuring that medications are safe and effective for children. To increase access to safety, efficacy and quality information in pediatric populations and to align with international standards, Health Canada is conducting a pilot of the pediatric study submission policy which includes the submission of a pediatric development plan (PDP) by the sponsor should they wish to participate in the pilot.1
Pediatric Study Submission Policy
Under the pilot for this policy which took effect on February 26, 2024, and runs for at least 2 years, Health Canada is asking sponsors who file a new drug submission (NDS) and certain supplements to a new drug submission (SNDS – for new indications, new dosage forms and new routes of administration) to include a PDP with their submission1,2. The PDP1:
- Should provide details of any ongoing or planned pediatric studies
- May also include a rationale for not studying the drug in all or part of the pediatric population
All studies within the PDP will be expected to be submitted to Health Canada.
According to Health Canada Guidance Submitting pediatric development plans and studies: Guidance - Canada.ca, the following classes of “drugs” will be under the scope of this policy1:
- Pharmaceutical drugs (prescription and non-prescription)
- Biologics, including biotechnology products, vaccines and fractionated blood products
- Radiopharmaceutical drugs
Medical devices, natural health products, biosimilar biologics, generics and disinfectants are out of scope. Pediatric populations for the purposes of this policy will include individuals aged from birth to under 18 years1.
Submissions relying on third-party data and administrative submissions are out of scope1.
Objectives of this policy1, 2:
- To encourage sponsors to submit, in a timely manner, safety and efficacy information for drugs expected to be used in pediatric populations
- To provide more information on the safety, efficacy and dosage of drugs used in pediatric populations to health care providers, patients and their families
When to submit plans and studies
Participation in the pilot is voluntary and will not affect the outcome or timeline of the review of NDS or SNDS2.
Health Canada asks sponsors to include the pediatric studies with an NDS or SNDS for the adult indication if a pediatric study plan has been completed or a pediatric study package is ready for regulatory review1. Health Canada will assess the pediatric studies based on Health Canada's established approach for assessing drug safety, efficacy and quality in a pediatric population1.
Submission of pediatric studies with an NDS or SNDS will not constitute participation in the pilot. However, if the pediatric studies are incomplete when the NDS or SNDS are filed, sponsors wishing to participate in the pilot should include a PDP with their submission in order to notify Health Canada of their intention to provide the studies at a later date. Sponsors will also need to complete a Pediatric Pilot Survey and include it in their submission1.
When filing the drug submission, Health Canada asks sponsors to specify in a note to reviewer if they are including pediatric studies or a pediatric development plan1.
Content of a Pediatric Development Plan
PDPs detail the research and development that a sponsor intends to undertake to generate information that may support the authorised use of a drug in a pediatric population. The plans may involve developing a1:
- Pediatric formulation
- pediatric extension of an existing indication
- New pediatric indication based on the active ingredient of the drug
To participate in the pilot, pediatric studies and/or the PDP must address1:
- Existing and proposed indications
- New dosage forms (if applicable)
- New routes of administration (if applicable)
During the pilot, Health Canada will ask all sponsors submitting an NDS or SNDS to complete a Pediatric Pilot Survey at the time of filing, for data collection purposes. The Survey will prompt sponsors to consider taking part in the pilot if their submissions are within scope1. Sponsors who choose to not participate will need to provide a rationale. A decision to not participate in the pilot and the reasons given will not affect Health Canada’s review of the NDS or SNDS1.
Under the pilot, sponsors may submit either an agreed US FDA initial Pediatric Study Plan (iPSP) or an approved EMA Pediatric Investigation Plan (EU-PIP). If no appropriate foreign plan is available from the US FDA or EMA, sponsors may prepare and include a Canadian-specific PDP (C-PDP).
Foreign-approved Plans
Sponsors who have both an iPSP and EU-PIP may select which plan to submit to participate in the pilot. Health Canada will accept the submitted plan as the PDP1.
Sponsors may choose to complete a supplementary annex (Canadian addendum) if they have additional information that may help to clarify aspects of their foreign plan. This addendum may include details such as1:
- Communications between sponsors and foreign regulators
- Special considerations to factors that are specific to the Canadian population (for example, genetic or extrinsic factors)
- Information that reflects the authorised indication(s) in Canada for drugs where the Canadian-authorised indication varies from that of the US FDA and/or EMA
- Relevant differences in the authorised and marketed therapies for the condition in Canada, compared to the therapies authorised and marketed in the jurisdiction for which the plan was developed
- Other information that the sponsor believes is relevant to the Canadian context
Canadian PDP
A C-PDP should include the following information1:
- Title page
- Section 1: Overview of the disease or condition in the pediatric population
- Section 2: Proposed pediatric development plan
- Section 2.1: Overview of planned extrapolation to specific pediatric populations
- Section 2.2: Rationale for not conducting studies
- Section 2.3: Tabular summary of planned nonclinical and clinical development
- Section 2.4: Development of age-appropriate formulation
- Section 2.5: Nonclinical studies
- Section 2.6: Clinical data to support design and/or initiation of studies in pediatric patients
- Section 2.7: Ongoing and planned pediatric studies
- Section 2.7.1: Pediatric pharmacokinetic or pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic studies
- Section 2.7.2: Clinical efficacy and safety studies
- Section 3: Agreements for pediatric studies with other regulatory authorities
Refer to Health Canada page: Canadian pediatric development plans: Guidance - Canada.ca for further information on format and content of a C-PDP1.
Health Canada encourages sponsors to consider the needs of all pediatric populations, including neonates, where possible, when developing their C-PDP. Sponsors may also propose studying the potential therapeutic benefits of the active ingredient of the drug in the relevant pediatric population for indications that go beyond those that complement existing and proposed adult indications. All data sources should be supported by references included with the submission.
The Survey, Canadian addendum to PDP and Canadian-specific PDP should be included in Module 1.0.7 General note to reviewer and a foreign agreed/approved PDP should be included in Module 1.2.7 International information1.
Conclusion
Health Canada's pilot program for PDPs represents a significant step forward in ensuring the safety and efficacy of medications for pediatric populations. By encouraging the submission of comprehensive PDPs alongside NDS and certain SNDSs, Health Canada aims to align with international standards and increase the availability of critical data. For this, Health Canada has issued the Submitting pediatric development plans and studies: Guidance - Canada.ca which outlines the agency’s policy on submitting a pediatric study. The guidance intends to assist sponsors to align their submissions with the policy by including pediatric studies and a PDP when filing an NDS or an SNDS that meets certain criteria. Submission of these data will increase the availability of safety, efficacy and quality data that will help health care providers make important decisions when treating pediatric populations. Specifically, the ongoing pilot program allows Health Canada to gain expertise around pediatric plans which is needed to provide important feedback for future policy decisions around Health Canada’s approach to pediatrics.
Part 2 of this blog series will cover the review of PDPs by Health Canada, amending agreed-to PDPs and annual reporting.
References:
1Health Canada. Guidance on submitting pediatric development plans and pediatric studies: Modified on May 01, 2024. Accessed February 24, 2025 at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/drug-products/pediatrics/guidance-submitting-development-plans-studies.html
2Health Canada. Pilot on pediatric development plans and studies. Modified on April 19, 2024. Accessed February 24, 2025 at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-health-products/drug-products/pediatrics/pilot-development-plans-studies.html
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
Exploring FDA guidance for modern Data Monitoring Committees
-
Streamlining dossier preparation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
-
Central Nervous System
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Challenges and opportunities in traumatic brain injury clinical trials
-
Challenges and opportunities in Parkinson’s Disease clinical trials
-
Early, precise and efficient; the methods and technologies advancing Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s R&D
-
Key Considerations in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials
-
ICON survey report: CNS therapeutic development
-
A mind for digital therapeutics
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel