The prevalence of obesity has more than doubled since 1990, with nearly one billion people living with obesity globally in 2022. Obesity raises risks for several health issues, including serious liver complications. Specifically, metabolic-dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and its more severe form, metabolic-dysfunction associated steatohepatitis (MASH), commonly develop in obese individuals, correlating with the degree of obesity.
Obesity’s role in liver disease progression
For individuals with both obesity and type 2 diabetes, the prevalence of MASLD, MASH and cirrhosis is notably higher. Additionally, obesity is an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a liver cancer with increased risk and mortality rates among obese individuals.
Obesity-driven metabolic changes, such as insulin resistance and lipotoxicity, contribute to liver damage, creating a pathway from MASLD to MASH and ultimately increasing the risk of HCC.
The importance of weight loss for liver health
Achieving and maintaining weight loss is critical to managing the hepatic complications associated with obesity. Studies indicate that sustained weight loss of 5-7% can improve hepatic steatosis and reduce liver inflammation, significantly benefiting patients with MASLD and MASH. However, to reverse hepatic fibrosis, a more severe consequence of liver disease, more extensive weight loss is necessary.
Dietary and lifestyle modifications are often the first line of treatment, as they can effectively promote weight loss and lead to liver health improvements. However, long-term weight maintenance remains challenging for many patients, and lifestyle changes alone are typically not enough for those with advanced hepatic conditions. This is where additional interventions, such as bariatric surgery, endoscopic bariatric procedures and pharmacologic therapies, become valuable options.
Bariatric surgery: A powerful tool for liver health
Bariatric surgery (BS) is highly effective for long-term weight loss, offering a reduction of 20-35% in body weight.1 Studies show substantial improvements in liver conditions post-surgery, with an 84% resolution of MASH, a reduction in fibrosis, and an 88% lower risk of disease progression. BS has also shown benefits for cardiovascular and obesity-related cancer risks.
Despite its effectiveness, BS is not for everyone. This surgery is generally recommended for patients with a BMI ≥35 or for those with obesity-related comorbidities at a BMI ≥30 who have not been able to achieve weight loss with other approaches. As a treatment option, it is affected by high costs, limited healthcare access and patients’ personal preferences around surgery as a treatment option. Nevertheless, for those who qualify, it remains one of the most effective interventions for managing obesity and its hepatic consequences.
Endoscopic bariatric procedures: A less invasive alternative
For patients who may not qualify for or prefer not to undergo bariatric surgery, endoscopic bariatric procedures offer a less invasive alternative for weight loss. These procedures, such as gastric balloons, endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty, and transpyloric shuttles, reduce gastric volume or delay stomach emptying, helping patients achieve a 10-20% total body weight reduction.
While the weight loss achieved through endoscopic bariatric procedures is generally lower than that seen with bariatric surgery, studies show that these methods still yield significant hepatic benefits. Patients undergoing endoscopic procedures have seen reductions in liver steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis — improvements that are valuable for managing MASH. However, some endoscopic techniques are temporary, and weight regain can occur if the procedure is reversed. Long-term studies are still assessing the impact of these procedures on hepatic, cardiovascular and cancer-related outcomes.
Pharmacologic therapies: Promising solutions for obesity and hepatic health
Pharmacologic therapies for obesity are becoming increasingly popular, particularly for individuals with a BMI ≥30 or with comorbidities at a BMI ≥27. Medications for obesity include orlistat, phentermine/topiramate, naltrexone/bupropion, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and GLP-1/GIP dual agonists. Each of these medications targets different aspects of weight regulation, with the newer GLP-1 and dual agonist therapies showing some of the most promising results. Studies have demonstrated that GLP-1 agonists can achieve sustained weight loss of up to 20%, a level that was previously attainable only through bariatric surgery.
For hepatic health, GLP-1 therapies have shown additional benefits, such as reductions in liver fat and inflammation. Patients on GLP-1 therapies are twice as likely as those on a placebo to achieve a 30% reduction in liver fat, and they experience improved hepatic histology. However, these medications are not without drawbacks; side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and gastrointestinal discomfort, along with the high cost of therapy, limit their use. Up to 25% of patients discontinue GLP-1 therapy within three months, with discontinuation rates even higher in economically disadvantaged and underserved populations.
Innovative therapies for liver health
The landscape of obesity treatment continues to evolve with promising new options, including dual and triple agonist therapies, which could offer weight reduction results comparable to BS through non-invasive means. While promising, many patients face barriers to long-term use due to side effects, cost and limited access in certain demographics. Patients impacted by early discontinuation were disproportionately African American, Hispanic, lived in areas of high economic need, or were on public insurance programs.2 As more research emerges, it is hoped that these therapies will become more accessible and tolerable for diverse populations to ensure the health benefits are more equitable across patient populations.
Conclusion: Managing obesity-related liver conditions
The liver is especially vulnerable to the metabolic disruptions of obesity, but weight loss — achieved through a mix of lifestyle, endoscopic, surgical or pharmacologic interventions — can mitigate or even reverse hepatic complications. With ongoing advancements in treatment, including the transformative GLP-1 receptor agonists and the increased prevalence of multi-indication therapies, there is renewed hope for those impacted by obesity-related liver conditions.
Connect with us to learn more about obesity clinical research and providing patients with an expanding set of tools to protect their hepatic health and improve their quality of life.
This article was first published on Journal for Clinical Studies in July 2024.
1 Alfadda A, et. al., Long-term weight outcomes after Bariatric Surgery: A single Center Arabian Cohort Experience. J. Clin. Med. Nov 2021; 10(21) 4922-4936
2 Do D, et. al., GLP-1 receptor Agonist Discontinuation Among Patients with Obesity and/or Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA network open. May 2024; 7(5): e2413172. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13172
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption: Surveying the industry's evolving landscape
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel