As obesity levels continue to rise, impacting millions globally, the quest for effective treatments has become a critical public health focus. The latest advances in drug development, particularly with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, are revolutionising the treatment landscape. However, this progress doesn’t come without challenges.
A recent ICON survey of over 100 obesity drug development professionals sheds light on current trends, therapeutic approaches and the roadblocks ahead in combating obesity and its comorbidities. Here, we outline some of the key takeaways and considerations as we drive progress in this therapeutic area.
GLP-1 receptor agonists and the shift in obesity treatment
For decades, obesity treatment centred primarily on lifestyle modifications like diet, exercise and behavioural therapy. However, these methods often fall short in the long term, as many patients regain most of their lost weight within five years.
Bariatric surgery has provided an effective yet invasive alternative to lifestyle-only modifications, though it is only suitable for a small subset of patients. Past pharmacological approaches to treatment have also faced setbacks – take the serious cardiovascular issues associated with fenfluramine in the 1990s – highlighting the potential risks of some drugs.
Now, with GLP-1 receptor agonists, a new generation of obesity treatments is emerging. Drugs like semaglutide and tirzepatide are not only aiding weight loss but also showing promise in managing comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD. GLP-1 receptor agonists stimulate insulin production, curb appetite and slow gastric emptying, making them among the most effective anti-obesity agents available. In ICON’s survey, a majority of respondents expressed confidence in their organisations' obesity treatment pipelines, signalling a promising future.
Embracing multi-indication therapies and obesity comorbidities
Obesity is rarely a standalone condition; it often coexists with issues like diabetes, cardiovascular disease and mental health conditions. Consequently, an integrated approach to obesity studies with multi-indication therapies that address these common comorbidities are gaining traction.
In ICON’s survey, the majority of respondents (64%) saw combination therapies as the future of obesity treatment while only 17% of respondents pointed to single therapies. Multi-indication research reflects this trend, with many respondents exploring obesity in conjunction with other therapeutic areas like diabetes (55%), other metabolic disorders (48%) and cardiovascular diseases (38%).
The multi-indication approach aligns with the complex biology of obesity, allowing researchers to tackle a spectrum of interlinked health issues. By addressing the root causes of obesity alongside associated conditions, these combination therapies could lead to more comprehensive and sustainable health outcomes.
Overcoming challenges in obesity drug development
Despite the advancements, obesity research and drug development face considerable clinical trial hurdles. Survey respondents ranked the top challenges as a lack of obesity-specific trial designs (39%), the need for long-term follow up (44%), and difficulty recruiting diverse patient populations (38%). Here’s how the industry is addressing each:
1. Innovative clinical trial design
Selecting the right clinical trial design is paramount to the success of any trial. Traditional trials may not be ideal for obesity studies, particularly those investigating multiple conditions. Innovative approaches like master protocols and basket trials allow researchers to test therapies across related indications, improving trial efficiency. This flexibility is essential for multi-indication obesity trials that aim to target interconnected health conditions.
2. Ensuring long term follow-up success
Long-term follow up (LTFU) data are vital for obesity drugs, particularly in proving their impact on related health events, such as heart disease. For instance, Novo Nordisk’s five-year SELECT trial demonstrated that Wegovy (semaglutide) reduced major cardiovascular events, setting a benchmark for other obesity treatments.
However, LTFUs add significant cost and complexity. To offset these challenges, sponsors can leverage efficiencies through patient-centric trial designs, such as hybrid and remote trials, which reduce participant burden and improve retention. Newer methods, including health data tokenisation, also support ongoing data collection from secondary sources like electronic health records.
3. Increasing diversity in obesity trial recruitment
Diversity in clinical trials is a growing priority, but obesity studies face unique obstacles. For instance, women constitute approximately 75% of obesity trial participants even though obesity rates are similar across genders. Racial and ethnic minorities are also underrepresented. To address these gaps, sponsors can use targeted, demographic-specific outreach strategies with innovative site identification and feasibility tools.
Digital health technologies, including wearables or apps, can ease and enhance the patient experience. This positively impacts retention and compliance rates by connecting, monitoring and engaging patients at every step of the clinical trial journey with customised support services and patient-centred solutions. Specifically, respondents noted that survey respondents believe that reducing patient burden (33%) and monetary incentives (30%) had the greatest potential impact on improving diverse patient recruitment.
The path ahead: Future trends and opportunities for obesity treatment
With obesity rates projected to reach one billion cases by 2030, the need for effective interventions is urgent. Fortunately, advances in drug development, especially in combination therapies, and innovative trial strategies provide reasons for optimism. Over half of ICON’s survey respondents expressed confidence in their organisation’s pipeline for obesity treatments, underscoring the industry’s dedication to improving outcomes for patients worldwide.
As the field continues to evolve, a collaborative approach that integrates innovative drug development, personalised care and patient-centric trials may be the key to combating this global health challenge. With the right strategies, the future of obesity treatment holds promise for both improving health and reducing the societal burden of this complex disease.
Contact us to learn how ICON’s holistic approach, experience, and expertise can help sponsors overcome the challenges associated with obesity research and clinical trials and position your trial for success.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption whitepaper
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel