The management of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients is fraught with challenges, particularly in accurately monitoring molecular responses and detecting treatment resistance. Traditional methods often fall short, especially when it comes to identifying atypical BCR::ABL1 transcripts and low-level mutations. ICON Specialty Laboratory Solutions has developed an innovative RNA-based next-generation Sequencing (NGS) assay that promises to revolutionise the landscape of CML monitoring.
Understanding the challenges in CML molecular monitoring
Approximately 98% of CML patients exhibit the common e14a2 or e13a2 BCR::ABL1 transcript types, while the remaining have atypical transcripts like e1a2 or e19a2 etc. Despite the effectiveness of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in treating CML, resistance often develops due to mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) or the myristoyl binding site of BCR-ABL1. This necessitates precise identification and monitoring of BCR::ABL1 transcripts and potential resistance mutations.
Current standard practice involves using multiplex PCR/Sanger or fusion detection NGS assays to identify the BCR::ABL1 transcript type at diagnosis. Subsequently, transcript-specific qPCR (such as e13/14a2 RT-qPCR) and sequencing assays (Sanger or NGS) are employed to monitor transcript levels and detect TKI resistance mutations. However, these methods have limitations, including the potential to overlook atypical transcripts and generate low-level false positives, complicating high-specificity mutation detection.
A novel RNA-based NGS assay
To address these challenges, ICON Specialty Laboratories has developed and validated a custom RNA-based NGS assay known as Dup-Seq BCR::ABL1. This innovative assay enables the identification of both common and atypical BCR::ABL1 transcript types and detects resistance mutations with superior sensitivity and accuracy, even at a variant allele frequency (VAF) as low as 1%.
Advantages of the Dup-Seq BCR::ABL1 assay
The Dup-Seq BCR::ABL1 assay offers several significant benefits over traditional methods:
- Comprehensive transcript identification: This assay can identify both common and atypical BCR::ABL1 transcripts, ensuring no transcript type is overlooked.
- High sensitivity and specificity: The assay’s enhanced sensitivity allows for the detection of mutations at VAFs as low as 1%, compared to the 3% threshold required by standard NGS assays. This early detection capability can be crucial for timely therapeutic intervention.
- Streamlined workflow: By combining transcript typing and mutation detection into a single assay, Dup-Seq simplifies the molecular testing workflow, making it more efficient and less error-prone.
Impact on clinical and trial settings
In routine clinical diagnostics, the Dup-Seq BCR::ABL1 assay can guide the selection of appropriate RT-qPCR assays for monitoring transcript level changes in new CML patients. In clinical trials, the assay’s ability to provide baseline transcript type identification and mutation testing is invaluable. During treatment, Dup-Seq can monitor the emergence and evolution of resistance mutations, offering a comprehensive view of the patient’s molecular response to therapy.
The assay’s capability to detect changes in transcript type during treatment also serves as a quality control measure, ensuring sample integrity and prompt repeat testing if discrepancies arise.
ICON’s novel RNA-based NGS assay, Dup-Seq BCR::ABL1, represents a significant advancement in the management of CML patients. By addressing the limitations of traditional methods, this assay enhances the accuracy and efficiency of molecular monitoring, offering clinicians and researchers a powerful tool in the fight against CML.
Read our latest interview with Dr Jin Li and Dr Chad Galderisi of ICON Specialty Laboratory Solutions on the advancements in molecular diagnostics for CML here.
You can also find out more on this approach in the Journal for Applied Laboratory Medicine (JALM).
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Digital Disruption whitepaper
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Digital Disruption whitepaper
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel