Decentralised clinical trials (DCTs) have revolutionised the way we conduct research, bringing convenience and accessibility to patients while enhancing the efficiency of data collection. DCTs offer several advantages over traditional, site-based approaches and have proven to improve patient engagement, retention and accelerate enrolment.
However, with every stride forward there is a need to refer back to the regulatory framework that is in place that ensures patient safety and maintains ethical standards.
There are challenges associated with DCTs that need to be considered when designing and conducting these studies. As DCTs become more prevalent, clear guidelines and oversight mechanisms are essential in ensuring that they are conducted safely and effectively.
This blog examines the crucial topic of regulating the use of DCTs, exploring what’s in place now and what sponsors need to consider as these methods continue to gain traction.
Current regulatory guidance
The regulatory landscape for DCTs is still emerging and evolving. This can make it difficult to know which laws and regulations apply, and how to comply with them. Additionally, because DCTs can be conducted almost anywhere using mobile technologies and the internet, there can be jurisdictional issues that complicate compliance. For example, if a trial is being conducted in multiple countries, each with its own laws and regulations, it can be difficult to ensure that all applicable laws and regulations are being followed. DCTs often involve new and innovative technology platforms and methods, all which need to be reviewed in terms of compliance.
The EMA has published a guidance (EMA/INS/GCP/112288/2023), and there is a Q&A document on qualifying novel methodologies (EMA, 2020) that are relevant to decentralised clinical trial approaches. The Q&A outlines a pre-approval procedure for the use of a variety of digital tools via an EMA/Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) qualification opinion. This is similar to the scientific advice procedure in the EU and the Innovative Science and Technology Approaches for New Drugs (STAND) program managed by the FDA. Since gaining pre-approval is a protracted process, sponsors should fully understand what is entailed before proceeding.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published draft guidance on the use of digital health technology in traditional and decentralised trials in May 2023 and is required to provide the final guidance no later than 29 December 2023. It has also created the Digital Health Center of Excellence (within the Center for Devices and Radiologic Health) to support the use of digital health technologies in product approvals as well as to maintain an inventory of related guidance.
Considerations for privacy and data management
If used in clinical trials, digital health technologies require additional safeguards to protect information from corruption, compromise, or loss due to the private and sensitive nature of the information. Across the globe, countries have enacted comprehensive data protection laws specifying how personal data can be collected, transmitted, and processed, and new privacy laws continue to be introduced as technology advances.
Informed consent is a critical part of any clinical trial and potential participants must be fully informed about all aspects of the trial before they can give their consent. Participants must also be made aware of how their data will be used and have the opportunity to opt out of having their data used for research, at any time. DCTs offer new opportunities for conducting clinical trials, but they also raise new privacy and security concerns. Steps must be taken to ensure that trial data is properly secured, and that subjects’ privacy rights are respected.
Conclusion
In summary, the development of DCTs has brought forward a range of new possibilities for trial innovation but the regulatory and legal environment continues to evolve, and the responsibility is on sponsors to keep up to date. To do this they must firstly be aware of the layers of regulatory and legal frameworks in place currently. Secondly, they need to have their finger on the pulse of developments at a country, regional and global level with real time regulatory intelligence. Doing so will help ensure that advancements and benefits of DCTs continue without compromising patient safety and regulatory compliance.
Read our whitepaper to find out more about the current regulatory landscape, applicable data privacy laws related to technologies, and gain some practical advice on how to keep on top of developments.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Digital Disruption whitepaper
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Digital Disruption whitepaper
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel