Over the last decade, patient-centric drug development and decentralised trials are rapidly becoming the standard approaches for how clinical research companies are running their trials. On one end, we have patients that assume a much more involved role in the design of a trial and in their own health care using technology; on the other end, we have pharmaceutical and biotech companies hungry for more accurate data.
In this patient-focused and data-driven environment, electronic clinical outcome assessments (eCOAs) have become a more widely used strategy to streamline patient data collection, provide real-time access to data (for review and monitoring), enhance patient engagement and improve the integrity and accuracy of clinical studies. However, while the electronic collection of data has many advantages, implementing an electronic approach to data collection, if not managed correctly, can put significant pressure on study startup timelines and end up on the critical path.
Why can eCOA implementation be so challenging?
Proper eCOA implementation requires the coordination of multiple service providers who have deliverables that are dependent on one another. The eCOA implementation requires:
- A service provider to secure license agreements from copyright holders for their permission to use their COA
- A language service provider who can translate COAs using linguistic validation and ensure that the questionnaires are migrated from paper to electronic format correctly and with accurate eCOA-adapted language
- An eCOA vendor who can build a reliable and robust platform according to that specific study protocol
- Most likely, the approval from a copyright holder at different stages of the development process of the electronic versions of the COAs
The key risk in eCOA implementation is the coordination of the deliverables for these service areas. Without coordination, trial startup milestones may be delayed. For example, if patient-facing eCOA material is not ready in time, it may cause delays to ethics submissions, and the first patient can only be enrolled at the site if the eCOA system is ready to collect the data.
What are the keys to a successful eCOA implementation?
The goal is to create a single project plan around the Sponsor’s study milestones led by one eCOA project manager responsible for coordinating the different services and parties. This plan has three critical stages:
1. Gather data for the eCOA plan:
To create a successful project plan, the project manager needs to involve all the stakeholders and gather all the data that will impact the delivery of that project early in the process.
- Define study startup (project) targets (e.g., planned submission dates and site activation dates)
- Understand each service provider’s delivery timelines
- Document any risk and assumptions in relation to the above
2. Create the eCOA implementation plan:
The project plan coordinates each service provider’s milestones in alignment with the Sponsor’s study timelines. All the stakeholders need to collectively review the plan. The plan will highlight at an early stage any downstream risks in eCOA implementation which can be discussed and mitigated at the project outset. For example, the screenshots may not be ready in time for submission, discuss the option of submitting paper-version followed by screenshots, etc. All the parties involved need to be on the same page before moving forward.
3. Execute the plan:
Be prepared that everything discussed so far will likely change significantly, tasks will take longer than expected and study startup targets will shift. Create an eCOA project team with members across the stakeholder groups and apply an agile-like methodology to manage project plan implementation. This can include:
- Regular weekly meetings with the service providers and preferably study startup and clinical leads to review the eCOA implementation plan status
- Discuss changes, create solutions and communicate frequently
- Ensure everyone is always on the same page
Everything happening in the industry and in the world suggests that electronic data collection is here to stay and will play an increasingly important role in clinical trials and drug development. In study startup timelines, every day matters. Therefore, early planning of an eCOA implementation strategy can significantly help stay on track with critical study milestones. Risk assessments around COA use can begin at the protocol design stage, and with a centralised management approach, can be mitigated to keep eCOA off the critical path.
Watch our recent webinar to learn more about important considerations for keeping eCOA off the critical path for clinical trial startups.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption whitepaper
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel