In traditional real-world, observational studies, only about one-quarter or so of all study sites usually enrol the majority of patients, while another 15 percent or so never enrol even one. Yet, the cost of assessing, training and activating a site, and then maintaining it for two to three months while waiting for the first patient, is the same no matter how many patients are finally recruited.
Patient-First Rapid Site Activation can greatly reduce the time and cost spent on non-performing sites by never activating them in the first place. In addition, it can accelerate study timelines by activating sites in a few days rather than a few weeks, and improve performance of successful sites by ensuring they are fully engaged with actual patients from the day they are activated.
The approach, when combined with a comprehensive site engagement model, can cut observational study costs by 30 percent to 40 percent compared with traditional methods. This highly streamlined and standardised site engagement and support model makes running real-world, post-market studies – which are increasingly demanded by regulators and payers – more financially attractive in the United States, where regulations favour such innovative study design and administration.
First patient enrolment triggers site activation
ICON developed Patient-First Rapid Site Activation to reverse the traditional approach – in which first patient enrolment can take weeks or sometimes months – by waiting until a site identifies its first patient before it is activated. The process can be completed primarily by telephone, and usually in less than a week.
Before activation, potential sites are identified and approached about participating in the study. Once a qualified patient is identified, the physician signs an abbreviated standardised contract, and undergoes final site assessment and training using pre-approved study start-up material, a pre-selected central institutional review board, and a simplified informed consent form.
ICON’s Patient-First Rapid Site Activation is well suited for late-phase observational studies because it has more regulatory flexibility and support, especially under US FDA guidelines, and lacks the stringent Good Clinical Practice requirements of Phase II/III studies. This enables the use of a lean, standardised study, site support, and administrative materials and practices.
No more non-performing sites
By waiting for an actual patient to enrol, Patient-First Rapid Site Activation completely eliminates the cost of activating and carrying non-performing sites. In addition, the streamlined and simplified activation process, supported by remote activation and site monitoring, significantly reduces the cost of administering sites that have recruited patients.
Eliminating the lag between site activation and patient recruitment also keeps sites and patients engaged, and increases the likelihood sites will enrol more patients sooner. Such engagement is further promoted through ICON’s Real-World Evidence Research Services Hub, which provides real-time support to sites through a single contact – from study launch through final data analysis – and gives patients the information and support they need to participate over the long haul.
Unique in the industry, ICON offers Patient-First Rapid Site Activation in all types of late-phase and observational studies, across all therapeutic areas.
To learn more or to speak with a late-phase expert about how ICON’s Patient-First Rapid Site Activation and hub site and patient support services can accelerate your study, contact us today.
In this section
-
Digital Disruption
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Digital Disruption whitepaper
- AI and clinical trials
-
Clinical trial data anonymisation and data sharing
-
Clinical Trial Tokenisation
-
Closing the evidence gap: The value of digital health technologies in supporting drug reimbursement decisions
-
Digital disruption in biopharma
-
Disruptive Innovation
- Remote Patient Monitoring
-
Personalising Digital Health
- Real World Data
-
The triad of trust: Navigating real-world healthcare data integration
-
Clinical strategies to optimise SaMD for treating mental health
-
Patient Centricity
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Capturing the voice of the patient in clinical trials
-
Charting the Managed Access Program Landscape
-
Developing Nurse-Centric Medical Communications
- Diversity and inclusion in clinical trials
-
Exploring the patient perspective from different angles
-
Patient safety and pharmacovigilance
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Taking safety reporting to the next level with automation
-
Outsourced Pharmacovigilance Affiliate Solution
-
The evolution of the Pharmacovigilance System Master File: Benefits, challenges, and opportunities
-
Sponsor and CRO pharmacovigilance and safety alliances
-
Understanding the Periodic Benefit-Risk Evaluation Report
-
A guide to safety data migrations
-
Patient voice survey
-
Patient Voice Survey - Decentralised and Hybrid Trials
-
Reimagining Patient-Centricity with the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)
-
Using longitudinal qualitative research to capture the patient voice
-
Agile Clinical Monitoring
-
Regulatory Intelligence
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
- EU Clinical Trials Regulation
-
Using innovative tools and lean writing processes to accelerate regulatory document writing
-
Current overview of data sharing within clinical trial transparency
-
Global Agency Meetings: A collaborative approach to drug development
-
Keeping the end in mind: key considerations for creating plain language summaries
-
Navigating orphan drug development from early phase to marketing authorisation
-
Procedural and regulatory know-how for China biotechs in the EU
-
RACE for Children Act
-
Early engagement and regulatory considerations for biotech
-
Regulatory Intelligence Newsletter
-
Requirements & strategy considerations within clinical trial transparency
-
Spotlight on regulatory reforms in China
-
Demystifying EU CTR, MDR and IVDR
-
Transfer of marketing authorisation
-
An innovative approach to rare disease clinical development
-
Therapeutics insights
- Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
- Cardiovascular
- Cell and Gene Therapies
- Central Nervous System
-
Glycomics
- Infectious Diseases
- NASH
- Oncology
- Paediatrics
-
Respiratory
-
Rare and orphan diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Cross-border enrollment of rare disease patients
-
Crossing the finish line: Why effective participation support strategy is critical to trial efficiency and success in rare diseases
-
Diversity, equity and inclusion in rare disease clinical trials
-
Identify and mitigate risks to rare disease clinical programmes
-
Leveraging historical data for use in rare disease trials
-
Natural history studies to improve drug development in rare diseases
-
Patient Centricity in Orphan Drug Development
-
The key to remarkable rare disease registries
-
Therapeutic spotlight: Precision medicine considerations in rare diseases
-
Advanced therapies for rare diseases
-
Transforming Trials
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Ensuring the validity of clinical outcomes assessment (COA) data: The value of rater training
-
Linguistic validation of Clinical Outcomes Assessments
-
Optimising biotech funding
- Adaptive clinical trials
-
Best practices to increase engagement with medical and scientific poster content
-
Decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
Decentralised and Hybrid clinical trials
-
Practical considerations in transitioning to hybrid or decentralised clinical trials
-
Navigating the regulatory labyrinth of technology in decentralised clinical trials
-
Biopharma perspective: the promise of decentralised models and diversity in clinical trials
-
eCOA implementation
- Blended solutions insights
-
Implications of COVID-19 on statistical design and analyses of clinical studies
-
Improving pharma R&D efficiency
-
Increasing Complexity and Declining ROI in Drug Development
-
Innovation in Clinical Trial Methodologies
- Partnership insights
-
Risk Based Quality Management
-
Transforming the R&D Model to Sustain Growth
-
Accelerating biotech innovation from discovery to commercialisation
-
Value Based Healthcare
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
US payers and PROs
-
Accelerated early clinical manufacturing
-
Cardiovascular Medical Devices
-
CMS Part D Price Negotiations: Is your drug on the list?
-
COVID-19 navigating global market access
-
Ensuring scientific rigor in external control arms
-
Evidence Synthesis: A solution to sparse evidence, heterogeneous studies, and disconnected networks
-
Global Outcomes Benchmarking
-
Health technology assessment
-
Perspectives from US payers
-
ICER’s impact on payer decision making
-
Making Sense of the Biosimilars Market
-
Medical communications in early phase product development
-
Navigating the Challenges and Opportunities of Value Based Healthcare
-
Payer Reliance on ICER and Perceptions on Value Based Pricing
-
Payers Perspectives on Digital Therapeutics
-
Precision Medicine
-
RWE Generation Cross Sectional Studies and Medical Chart Review
-
Survey results: How to engage healthcare decision-makers
-
The affordability hurdle for gene therapies
-
The Role of ICER as an HTA Organisation
-
Strategies for commercialising oncology treatments for young adults
-
Blog
-
Videos
-
Webinar Channel